Rebalancing: Strategy| Rebalancing: Strategy | Constant Mix | Constant Proportion (e.g., CPPI) | Buy and Hold |
| |
| |
| Optimal for investors with a floor value? |
| a floor value which limits his or her willingness to take risks if one's portfolio declines below that value | floor value >= 0 |
| Optimal for investors with absolute risk tolerance that: | - varies proportionately with wealth
- 0 < one's multiplier < 1
|
- varies by more than any change in one's wealth
- one's multiplier > 1
| |
| GOOD performance if markets are | Ups and downs (mean-reversion, or "volatile" markets) | Trending (with no or few reversals) | in the middle of Constant Mix and Constant Proportion
|
| POOR performance if markets are | Trending (with no or few reversals) | Ups and downs | in the middle of Constant Mix and Constant Proportion
|
| Payoff Curve | Concave (*1) | Convex | Linear |
Also,
Calendar Strategy's Rebalancing Frequency depends on
volatility of asset class in the portfolio.
(*1) It supplies liquidity to the market, in effect "selling insurance" by taking the less popular side of trades when the market is trending up or down.
Rebalancing: Factors| # | Factor |
| | |
| 1 | Volatility | High | | Low |
| 2 | Frequency | Infrequent | Appropriately frequent | Too frequent |
| Market Impact / Trading Cost | High
- Asset mix can drift to the point where rebalancing could create a market impact, thus increasing the cost of trading dramatically.
| Low
- Market impact will be lower with more frequent rebalancing.
| High
- Portfolio could incur numerous costly small trades to achieve minor adjustments in the asset mix.
|
Rebalancing: Corridor| # |
|
| | | |
| 1 | Risk tolerance | | High |
| |
| 2 | Flexibility for the asset allocation relative to the target mix | | High | | |
| 3 | Volatility | |
| Low | High |
| 4 | Correlation with the rest of the portfolio | |
| High | Low |
| 5 | Transaction Cost | |
| High | Low |
| Rebalancing Corridor Width | | Wide | Wide | Narrow (*2) |
(*2) The narrow corridor means that small changes in value may necessitate rebalancing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment